SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L
SAUM.L (iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and JRDE.L (JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - SAUM.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while JRDE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAUM.L returned 15.71%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for JRDE.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SAUM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JRDE.L.
Performance
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SAUM.L is traded in GBP, while JRDE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than JRDE.L's 6.47% return.
SAUM.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
JRDE.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 7.86% | 28.60% | 4.78% | 17.25% | -7.39% | 0.93% |
JRDE.L JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) | 6.47% | 25.66% | 2.21% | 14.40% | -3.79% | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUM.L and JRDE.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SAUM.L and JRDE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Technology
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Industrials
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Consumer Cyclical
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Utilities
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Healthcare
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Consumer Defensive
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Communication Services
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Energy
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Basic Materials
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Real Estate
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAUM.L
JRDE.L
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAUM.L | JRDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.73 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 6.00 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAUM.L | JRDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.53 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.72 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than JRDE.L's maximum drawdown of -15.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and JRDE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUM.L | JRDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -15.75% | -15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -10.94% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -12.84% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -2.07% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -3.73% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.16% | -0.04% |
Volatility
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDE.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that SAUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAUM.L | JRDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.98% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 10.29% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 12.39% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 14.16% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 14.16% | +4.85% |
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDE.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SAUM.L vs. JRDE.L - Dividend Comparison
SAUM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRDE.L JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) | 2.19% | 2.18% | 2.68% | 1.11% | 2.99% |
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SAUM.L and JRDE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SAUM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAUM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRDE.L.
SAUM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while JRDE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAUM.L and 0.25% for JRDE.L.
Find the right allocation for SAUM.L and JRDE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer