PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAUG vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SAUG vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SAUG vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August
0.92%8.23%11.08%6.26%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.44%11.36%-2.18%-0.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUG achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


SAUG

1D
1.72%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
0.92%
6M
2.82%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SAUG vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SAUG vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUG
SAUG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUG vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAUGTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

0.84

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.17

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.42

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

3.74

+4.21

SAUG vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUG and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAUGTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.84

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-0.03

+0.88

Correlation

The correlation between SAUG and TLTW is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SAUG vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.


TTM2025202420232022
SAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

SAUG vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SAUGTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-18.61%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-5.80%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-2.98%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-8.49%

+6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.20%

-0.41%

Volatility

SAUG vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SAUGTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.46%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

5.80%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

8.91%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

11.55%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

11.55%

+0.56%