PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAUG vs. KLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SAUG vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SAUG vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUG achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -8.98% return.


SAUG

1D
1.72%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
0.92%
6M
2.82%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KLIP

1D
2.10%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-8.98%
6M
-12.63%
1Y
-1.25%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SAUG vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SAUG vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUG
SAUG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUG vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAUGKLIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

-0.06

+1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

0.05

+1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.01

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

-0.08

+1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

-0.26

+8.20

SAUG vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUG and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAUGKLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

-0.06

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.35

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between SAUG and KLIP is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SAUG vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.24%.


Drawdowns

SAUG vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and KLIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SAUGKLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-18.61%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-17.23%

+8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-14.21%

+11.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-3.34%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

5.18%

-3.39%

Volatility

SAUG vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) is 3.60%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that SAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SAUGKLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

7.16%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

13.48%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

19.76%

-7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

18.19%

-6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

18.19%

-6.08%