PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAUG vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SAUG vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SAUG vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August
0.92%8.23%11.08%6.26%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%7.70%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SAUG having a 0.92% return and ISWN slightly higher at 0.94%.


SAUG

1D
1.72%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
0.92%
6M
2.82%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SAUG vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SAUG vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUG
SAUG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUG vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAUGISWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.86

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.61

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

6.68

+1.26

SAUG vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUG and ISWN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAUGISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-0.04

+0.89

Correlation

The correlation between SAUG and ISWN is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SAUG vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021
SAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Drawdowns

SAUG vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and ISWN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SAUGISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-32.35%

+17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-9.63%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-7.11%

+4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-16.57%

+14.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.32%

-0.53%

Volatility

SAUG vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) is 3.60%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that SAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SAUGISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

6.13%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

8.60%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

11.81%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

11.47%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

11.40%

+0.71%