SAUG vs. AAPR
SAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August) and AAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SAUG returned 19.51% vs 9.83% for AAPR. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAUG charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for AAPR.
Performance
SAUG vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUG achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than AAPR's 3.82% return.
SAUG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPR
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAUG vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 7.65% | 8.23% | 7.87% |
AAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 | 3.82% | 7.79% | 6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUG and AAPR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SAUG and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAUG vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank
SAUG
AAPR
SAUG vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAUG | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.99 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 12.12 | -7.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.56 | 62.99 | -47.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAUG | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 4.18 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.73 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
SAUG vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and AAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUG | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -5.99% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.10% | -0.81% | -3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.15% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -0.45% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 0.16% | +1.10% |
Volatility
SAUG vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) at 0.68%. This indicates that SAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAUG | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 0.68% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.41% | 1.57% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.59% | 2.36% | +7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 4.81% | +7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 4.81% | +7.00% |
SAUG vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAUG vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAUG nor AAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAUG and AAPR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAUG has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to AAPR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAUG dropped -14.62% vs AAPR's -5.99%.
On 1-year performance, SAUG leads with 19.51% vs 9.83% for AAPR. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SAUG has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SAUG.
SAUG and AAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SAUG and 0.79% for AAPR.
AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAUG and AAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer