SATO vs. SUSA
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while SUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 20.64%/yr vs 18.81%/yr for SUSA. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SUSA.
Performance
SATO vs. SUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a -11.75% return, which is significantly lower than SUSA's 11.44% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- -10.88%
- 6M
- -23.63%
- YTD
- -11.75%
- 1Y
- -22.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUSA
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
SATO vs. SUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | -11.75% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 266.77% | -80.20% | -17.33% |
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 11.44% | 15.72% | 22.43% | 23.88% | -21.38% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and SUSA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SATO and SUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. SUSA — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
SUSA
SATO vs. SUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SATO | SUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.31 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.36 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 10.02 | -10.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SATO vs. SUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than SUSA's maximum drawdown of -53.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and SUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | SUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -53.93% | -34.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | -9.71% | -43.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | -19.30% | -34.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.92% | -0.73% | -45.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.75% | -7.22% | -43.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.01% | 2.28% | +29.73% |
Volatility
SATO vs. SUSA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) at 3.96%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | SUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 3.96% | +8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.10% | 10.48% | +27.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.01% | 13.00% | +39.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.99% | 17.43% | +45.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.99% | 18.13% | +44.86% |
SATO vs. SUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. SUSA - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than SUSA's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.60% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 0.84% | 0.89% | 1.15% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.56% | 1.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and SUSA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SATO has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to SUSA (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs SUSA's -53.93%.
On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 20.64% vs 18.81% for SUSA. On fees, SUSA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 18.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUSA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 0.84% for SUSA.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SUSA is Large Cap Growth Equities. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.25% for SUSA.
SUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATO and SUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer