SATO vs. MSBT
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SATO tracks the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
SATO vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SATO
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 46.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -6.05%
- 1M
- -14.36%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SATO vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 25.03% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and MSBT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
MSBT
SATO vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATO | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATO | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -1.02 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
SATO vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -18.03% | -69.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.80% | -18.03% | -16.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -3.48% | -47.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | — | — |
Volatility
SATO vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.47% | 32.70% | +18.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 32.70% | +30.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 32.70% | +30.59% |
SATO vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, while MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.41% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and MSBT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for SATO and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer