PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SATO vs. CBOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SATO vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SATO

1D
-2.72%
1M
5.43%
YTD
6.41%
6M
-5.78%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
46.97%
5Y*
10Y*

CBOO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SATO and CBOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SATO vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO
SATO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SATOCBOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.65

SATO vs. CBOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SATOCBOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

-1.16

+1.17

Drawdowns

SATO vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and CBOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SATOCBOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.00%

-2.34%

-85.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.80%

-1.68%

-33.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.02%

-1.61%

-49.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.07%

Volatility

SATO vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SATOCBOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.47%

2.15%

+49.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.29%

2.15%

+61.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.29%

2.15%

+61.14%

SATO vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

SATO vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CBOO
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October
0.57%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
7.41%9.50%15.03%2.21%8.97%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


SATO and CBOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.

SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.69% for CBOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SATO and CBOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer