SATO vs. CBOO
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SATO is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
SATO vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SATO
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 46.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SATO vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 6.41% | -37.04% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.00% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and CBOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
CBOO
SATO vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -1.16 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
SATO vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -2.34% | -85.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.80% | -1.68% | -33.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -1.61% | -49.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | — | — |
Volatility
SATO vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.47% | 2.15% | +49.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 2.15% | +61.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 2.15% | +61.14% |
SATO vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.41% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and CBOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for SATO and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer