PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SATO vs. BTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SATO vs. BTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than BTC's -23.26% return.


SATO

1D
-2.72%
1M
5.43%
YTD
6.41%
6M
-5.78%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
46.97%
5Y*
10Y*

BTC

1D
-5.98%
1M
-14.35%
YTD
-23.26%
6M
-26.27%
1Y
-35.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
6.41%2.26%31.70%
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
-23.26%-7.50%44.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and BTC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.79

The correlation between SATO and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SATO vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO
SATO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC
BTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SATOBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

-0.82

+1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

-1.09

+1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.88

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

-0.73

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.65

-1.27

+1.91

SATO vs. BTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the BTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATO and BTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SATOBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

-0.82

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.03

-0.03

Drawdowns

SATO vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and BTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SATOBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.00%

-49.34%

-38.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.49%

-49.34%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.80%

-46.52%

+11.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.02%

-16.54%

-34.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.07%

28.22%

+0.85%

Volatility

SATO vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 9.68%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SATOBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.41%

9.68%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.64%

34.83%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.47%

43.61%

+7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.29%

48.31%

+14.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.29%

48.31%

+14.98%

SATO vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SATO vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, while BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
7.41%9.50%15.03%2.21%8.97%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


SATO and BTC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SATO has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to BTC (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs BTC's -49.34%.

On 1-year performance, SATO leads with 16.97% vs -35.77% for BTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SATO has performed better with a 16.97% return vs -35.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.15% for BTC.

SATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SATO and BTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer