SATG vs. UWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SATG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF) and UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SATG is actively managed, while UWM is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SATG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UWM.

Performance

SATG vs. UWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF (SATG) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATG achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than UWM's 31.87% return.

SATG

• 1D: -4.52%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UWM

• 1D: -2.69%
• 1M: 6.41%
• YTD: 31.87%
• 6M: 28.56%
• 1Y: 76.77%
• 3Y*: 25.03%
• 5Y*: 1.71%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATG vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SATG Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF	1.45%	8.74%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	31.87%	-3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SATG and UWM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

SATG vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWM

UWM Risk / Return Rank: 59
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATG vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF (SATG) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SATG	UWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.14	+0.07

Drawdowns

SATG vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATG drawdown since its inception was -39.11%, smaller than the maximum UWM drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATG and UWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SATG	UWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.11%	-88.21%	+49.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-49.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.28%	-3.55%	-25.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.37%	-30.88%	+10.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SATG	UWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	111.32%	38.04%	+73.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.32%	45.01%	+66.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.32%	46.08%	+65.24%

SATG vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UWM's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SATG vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison

SATG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SATG Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	0.78%	1.05%	1.16%	0.34%	0.40%	0.00%	0.07%	0.55%	0.41%	0.11%	0.27%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SATG and UWM in my portfolio?

SATG and UWM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SATG or UWM?

On fees, SATG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SATG or UWM?

SATG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UWM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SATG or UWM?

UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for SATG.

What is the main difference between SATG and UWM?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SATG and 0.95% for UWM.