SATG vs. NRGU
SATG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SATG is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. SATG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.
Performance
SATG vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATG achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 125.94% return.
SATG
- 1D
- 6.08%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 125.94%
- 6M
- 93.16%
- 1Y
- 171.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SATG vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SATG Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF | 7.62% | 8.74% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 125.94% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATG and NRGU is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATG vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
SATG
NRGU
SATG vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SATS Daily ETF (SATG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATG | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.43 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
SATG vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATG drawdown since its inception was -39.11%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATG and NRGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATG | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.11% | -57.50% | +18.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.99% | -22.07% | -2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.41% | -25.41% | +5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.01% | — |
Volatility
SATG vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATG | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 31.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 61.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.16% | 75.02% | +36.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.16% | 89.03% | +22.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.16% | 89.03% | +22.13% |
SATG vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATG vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SATG nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SATG and NRGU have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SATG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SATG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.
SATG and NRGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SATG and 0.95% for NRGU.
Find the right allocation for SATG and NRGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer