SARK vs. SPXU
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). SARK is actively managed, while SPXU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -30.30%/yr vs -40.85%/yr for SPXU. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPXU.
Performance
SARK vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly higher than SPXU's -20.19% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- -19.94%
- 3Y*
- -30.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
SARK vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.20% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 24.05% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -6.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and SPXU is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SARK and SPXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
SPXU
SARK vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.79 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | -0.94 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -1.61 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and SPXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -99.99% | +18.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.61% | -47.11% | +20.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -84.36% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.29% | -99.99% | +20.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.79% | -93.33% | +46.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.99% | 29.37% | -13.38% |
Volatility
SARK vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is 12.56%, while ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that SARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.56% | 14.32% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.66% | 29.53% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.83% | 37.35% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.15% | 50.62% | +5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.15% | 53.43% | +2.72% |
SARK vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than SPXU's 7.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.00% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and SPXU have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to SARK (12.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs SPXU's -99.99%.
On 3-year performance, SARK leads with -30.30% vs -40.85% for SPXU. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 12.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SARK has performed better with a -30.30% return vs -40.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 3.00% for SARK.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPXU is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.90% for SPXU.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and SPXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer