SARK vs. SEF
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds. SARK is actively managed, while SEF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -30.74%/yr vs -10.34%/yr for SEF. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
SARK vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
SARK vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 20.78% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and SEF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SARK and SEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
SEF
SARK vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SARK | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.06 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 0.39 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 0.73 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SARK | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 0.26 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.49 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
SARK vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -96.51% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.75% | -9.72% | -31.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -39.40% | -35.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.42% | -96.09% | +16.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.46% | -82.72% | +36.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.47% | 5.14% | +25.33% |
Volatility
SARK vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 3.01% | +6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.05% | 10.85% | +14.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.91% | 14.34% | +21.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 17.96% | +38.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 20.52% | +35.72% |
SARK vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than SEF's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and SEF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.34% vs -30.74% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.34% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 3.02% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer