SARK vs. PPI
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -30.74%/yr vs 22.47%/yr for PPI. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPI.
Performance
SARK vs. PPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than PPI's 16.52% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 38.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 0.98% |
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 16.52% | 30.05% | 6.43% | 11.33% | 4.04% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and PPI is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021 | -0.54 |
The correlation between SARK and PPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.58 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
PPI
SARK vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SARK | PPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.43 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 4.82 | -5.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 15.72 | -16.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SARK | PPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 2.45 | -3.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.80 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
SARK vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than PPI's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and PPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | PPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -24.54% | -56.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.75% | -7.98% | -32.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -20.70% | -53.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.42% | -3.26% | -76.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.46% | -6.50% | -39.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.47% | 2.44% | +28.03% |
Volatility
SARK vs. PPI - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) at 4.37%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | PPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 4.37% | +4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.05% | 12.56% | +12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.91% | 15.73% | +20.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 19.04% | +37.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 19.04% | +37.20% |
SARK vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than PPI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.60% | 2.87% | 2.40% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and PPI have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to PPI (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs PPI's -24.54%.
On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 22.47% vs -30.74% for SARK. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 22.47% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.01% for PPI.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while PPI is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.58% for PPI.
PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and PPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer