SARK vs. PPI
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -28.52%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for PPI. Their -0.54 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPI.
Performance
SARK vs. PPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than PPI's 15.76% return.
SARK
- 1D
- -4.39%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 1Y
- -14.81%
- 3Y*
- -28.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.60%
PPI
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $458.77K | $622.77K | $642.93K | |
| $5.02M | $4.74M | $6.36M |
SARK vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -7.36% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | -1.12% |
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 15.76% | 30.05% | 6.43% | 11.33% | 4.04% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and PPI is -0.59, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2021 | -0.54 |
The correlation between SARK and PPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
PPI
SARK vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | PPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.28 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.41 | -3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 8.54 | -9.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than PPI's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and PPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | PPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -24.54% | -56.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.34% | -7.98% | -18.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -20.70% | -53.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.55% | -3.90% | -75.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.59% | -6.43% | -41.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 3.19% | +11.58% |
Volatility
SARK vs. PPI - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) at 4.24%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | PPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 4.24% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.06% | 12.33% | +15.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.50% | 16.71% | +19.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 18.94% | +36.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 18.94% | +36.82% |
SARK vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than PPI's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 1.30% | 1.06% | 0.60% | 2.87% | 2.40% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.04% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and PPI have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to PPI (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs PPI's -24.54%.
On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 18.90% vs -28.52% for SARK. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 18.90% return vs -28.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.30% for PPI.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while PPI is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.58% for PPI.
PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and PPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer