PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SARK vs. PPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SARK vs. PPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than PPI's 16.52% return.


SARK

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
-6.78%
6M
-2.33%
1Y
-33.81%
3Y*
-30.74%
5Y*
10Y*

PPI

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
16.52%
6M
17.66%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SARK vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
-6.78%-25.93%-36.90%-46.32%83.35%0.98%
PPI
Astoria Real Assets ETF
16.52%30.05%6.43%11.33%4.04%0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SARK and PPI is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021

-0.54

The correlation between SARK and PPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.58 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SARK vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SARK
SARK Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PPI
PPI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SARK vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SARKPPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.43

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

4.82

-5.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

15.72

-16.83

SARK vs. PPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the PPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SARK and PPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SARKPPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

2.45

-3.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.80

-1.04

Drawdowns

SARK vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than PPI's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and PPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SARKPPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.07%

-24.54%

-56.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.75%

-7.98%

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.42%

-20.70%

-53.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.42%

-3.26%

-76.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.46%

-6.50%

-39.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.47%

2.44%

+28.03%

Volatility

SARK vs. PPI - Volatility Comparison

Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) at 4.37%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SARKPPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

4.37%

+4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.05%

12.56%

+12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.91%

15.73%

+20.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.24%

19.04%

+37.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.24%

19.04%

+37.20%

SARK vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SARK vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison

SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than PPI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PPI
Astoria Real Assets ETF
1.01%1.06%0.60%2.87%2.40%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
3.02%2.82%15.49%12.57%25.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SARK and PPI have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SARK has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to PPI (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs PPI's -24.54%.

On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 22.47% vs -30.74% for SARK. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 22.47% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.

SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.01% for PPI.

SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while PPI is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.58% for PPI.

PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SARK and PPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer