SARK vs. KNO
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and KNO (AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while KNO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SARK returned -18.77% vs 29.15% for KNO. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for KNO.
Performance
SARK vs. KNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -9.84% return, which is significantly lower than KNO's 20.28% return.
SARK
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -9.84%
- 1Y
- -18.77%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK vs. KNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -9.84% | -25.93% | -44.00% |
KNO AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF | 20.28% | 19.84% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and KNO is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2024 | -0.59 |
The correlation between SARK and KNO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. KNO — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
KNO
SARK vs. KNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | KNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 2.51 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 9.75 | -11.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. KNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than KNO's maximum drawdown of -15.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and KNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | KNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -15.50% | -65.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.34% | -11.67% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.10% | -5.30% | -74.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.22% | -2.94% | -44.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.02% | 3.00% | +12.02% |
Volatility
SARK vs. KNO - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) at 7.96%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | KNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.61% | 7.96% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.73% | 15.80% | +10.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.95% | 17.66% | +18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.88% | 17.34% | +38.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.88% | 17.34% | +38.54% |
SARK vs. KNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KNO's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. KNO - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than KNO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNO AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF | 0.90% | 1.08% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.13% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and KNO have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to KNO (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs KNO's -15.50%.
On 1-year performance, KNO leads with 29.15% vs -18.77% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNO has been the lower-risk option at 7.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KNO has performed better with a 29.15% return vs -18.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for KNO.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.90% for KNO.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while KNO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.84% for KNO.
KNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and KNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer