PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SARK vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SARK vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 21.08% return.


SARK

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
-6.78%
6M
-2.33%
1Y
-33.81%
3Y*
-30.74%
5Y*
10Y*

ARKQ

1D
-2.13%
1M
8.33%
YTD
21.08%
6M
23.88%
1Y
72.69%
3Y*
39.07%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
22.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SARK vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
-6.78%-25.93%-36.90%-46.32%83.35%20.78%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
21.08%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%-11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SARK and ARKQ is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

-0.87

The correlation between SARK and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SARK vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SARK
SARK Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SARK vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SARKARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.34

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

3.55

-4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

10.75

-11.86

SARK vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SARK and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SARKARKQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

2.25

-3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.66

-0.90

Drawdowns

SARK vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SARKARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.07%

-59.89%

-21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.75%

-20.58%

-20.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.42%

-30.76%

-43.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.42%

-3.47%

-75.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.46%

-17.24%

-29.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.47%

6.78%

+23.69%

Volatility

SARK vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is 9.13%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that SARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SARKARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

10.45%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.05%

24.44%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.91%

32.49%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.24%

32.23%

+24.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.24%

29.84%

+26.40%

SARK vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SARK and ARKQ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

SARK vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than ARKQ's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
3.02%2.82%15.49%12.57%25.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SARK and ARKQ have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to SARK (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

On 3-year performance, ARKQ leads with 39.07% vs -30.74% for SARK. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 39.07% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SARK and ARKQ have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.22% for ARKQ.

SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ARKQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and ARK.

ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SARK and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer