SARK vs. AAPX
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while AAPX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SARK returned -18.22% vs 82.26% for AAPX. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for AAPX.
Performance
SARK vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly lower than AAPX's 7.58% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- -18.22%
- 3Y*
- -30.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -11.09%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 82.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.13% | -25.93% | -40.48% |
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 7.58% | -4.95% | 58.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and AAPX is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
AAPX
SARK vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.75 | -3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 6.38 | -7.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and AAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -58.55% | -22.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.61% | -30.12% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.28% | -14.39% | -64.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.82% | -19.16% | -27.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.85% | 12.93% | +2.92% |
Volatility
SARK vs. AAPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is 12.56%, while T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that SARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.56% | 14.05% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.56% | 33.55% | -6.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.79% | 45.55% | -9.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.13% | 54.44% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.13% | 54.44% | +1.69% |
SARK vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than AAPX's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 21.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.00% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and AAPX have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPX has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to SARK (12.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs AAPX's -58.55%.
On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 82.26% vs -18.22% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 12.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 82.26% return vs -18.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.62% for AAPX.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AAPX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 1.05% for AAPX.
AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and AAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer