SAOAX vs. QAMNX
SAOAX (Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund) and QAMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, SAOAX returned 10.13%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for QAMNX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SAOAX charges 1.76%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for QAMNX.
Performance
SAOAX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAOAX achieves a 18.07% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's -0.14% return.
SAOAX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 18.07%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.89%
QAMNX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAOAX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 18.07% | -2.00% | 10.49% | 8.81% | -8.66% | 8.26% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | -0.14% | 10.00% | 17.33% | 4.71% | 9.19% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAOAX and QAMNX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAOAX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank
SAOAX
QAMNX
SAOAX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAOAX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.10 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 0.76 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 1.74 | +8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAOAX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.48 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.82 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
SAOAX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAOAX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAOAX and QAMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAOAX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.28% | -17.97% | -34.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.45% | -4.16% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.90% | -4.16% | -31.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.16% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -5.15% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.80% | +0.02% |
Volatility
SAOAX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 2.24%. This indicates that SAOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAOAX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 2.24% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 5.11% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.71% | 6.66% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 13.86% | +14.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 13.86% | +7.30% |
SAOAX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAOAX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAOAX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison
SAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than QAMNX's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.85% | 5.89% | 11.74% | 20.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 0.61% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 0.62% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.22% | 0.92% | 1.17% | 7.07% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAOAX and QAMNX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAOAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to QAMNX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAOAX dropped -52.28% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.
SAOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAOAX and QAMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer