SAOAX vs. CRIHX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX).

SAOAX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Jul 6, 2003. CRIHX is managed by CRM. It was launched on Aug 15, 2016.

Performance

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund	10.14%	-2.00%	10.49%	8.81%	-8.66%	14.38%	0.17%	-2.26%	-11.25%	7.48%
CRIHX CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund	-1.18%	-1.55%	17.72%	6.06%	-4.24%	5.91%	20.44%	12.95%	-8.43%	4.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAOAX achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly higher than CRIHX's -1.18% return.

SAOAX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 10.14%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: 7.96%
• 5Y*: 4.58%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

CRIHX

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: -1.18%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: 6.17%
• 5Y*: 3.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAOAX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than CRIHX's 1.60% expense ratio.

SAOAX

Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund

CRIHX

CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund

Return for Risk

SAOAX vs. CRIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAOAX

SAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 23
SAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
SAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CRIHX

CRIHX Risk / Return Rank: 22
CRIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CRIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CRIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CRIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CRIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAOAX	CRIHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	0.57	-0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	0.90	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.11	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	0.72	-0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.73	2.27	-1.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the CRIHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAOAX and CRIHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAOAX	CRIHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10	0.57	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.35	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.45	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between SAOAX and CRIHX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Dividend Comparison

SAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while CRIHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund	0.65%	0.71%	1.06%	0.62%	0.72%	0.82%	1.22%	0.92%	1.17%	7.07%	0.03%
CRIHX CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.11%	2.32%	1.55%	0.75%	8.83%	0.03%	1.75%	0.24%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAOAX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than CRIHX's maximum drawdown of -21.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAOAX and CRIHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAOAX	CRIHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.28%	-21.33%	-30.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.08%	-9.07%	-26.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.90%	-15.87%	-20.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-8.27%	+7.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-4.15%	-4.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.97%	2.89%	+4.08%

Volatility

SAOAX vs. CRIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) is 2.82%, while CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that SAOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAOAX	CRIHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	4.68%	-1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.04%	9.34%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.36%	13.02%	+48.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.68%	11.10%	+17.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.13%	11.01%	+10.12%