PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAOAX vs. JAKRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAOAX achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than JAKRX's 12.80% return.


SAOAX

1D
0.17%
1M
4.27%
YTD
18.26%
6M
19.57%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
3.91%

JAKRX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.80%
6M
13.69%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SAOAX and JAKRX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAOAX vs. JAKRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAOAX
SAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

JAKRX
JAKRX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JAKRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAOAXJAKRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.72

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

5.14

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.26

18.09

-7.83

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the JAKRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAOAX and JAKRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAOAXJAKRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

3.58

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

3.97

-3.66

Drawdowns

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAOAX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than JAKRX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAOAX and JAKRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAOAXJAKRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.28%

-5.16%

-47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.45%

-5.16%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.66%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-0.80%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.46%

+0.36%

Volatility

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) at 2.41%. This indicates that SAOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAOAXJAKRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.41%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.23%

5.86%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

7.43%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

7.29%

+21.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

7.29%

+13.86%

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAOAX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKRX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAOAX vs. JAKRX - Dividend Comparison

SAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than JAKRX's 7.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JAKRX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A
7.18%8.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAOAX
Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund
0.60%0.71%1.06%0.62%0.72%0.82%1.22%0.92%1.17%7.07%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAOAX and JAKRX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAOAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to JAKRX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAOAX dropped -52.28% vs JAKRX's -5.16%.

JAKRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAOAX and JAKRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer