SAMT vs. RAA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SAMT (Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF) and RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAMT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Strategas, while RAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by SMI Advisory Services. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SAMT returned 42.07% vs 24.53% for RAA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAMT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RAA.

Performance

SAMT vs. RAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMT achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than RAA's 11.05% return.

SAMT

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: 20.25%
• 6M: 23.92%
• 1Y: 42.07%
• 3Y*: 28.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RAA

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 11.05%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 24.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMT vs. RAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	20.25%	27.22%
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	11.05%	12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMT and RAA is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.72

The correlation between SAMT and RAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SAMT vs. RAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMT

SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 77
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RAA

RAA Risk / Return Rank: 81
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMT vs. RAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAMT	RAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.60	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.57	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.48	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.19	4.17	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.30	16.80	-2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAMT vs. RAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the RAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMT and RAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAMT	RAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.60	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	1.49	-0.52

Drawdowns

SAMT vs. RAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMT drawdown since its inception was -20.57%, which is greater than RAA's maximum drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMT and RAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAMT	RAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.57%	-11.80%	-8.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.15%	-5.91%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.40%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-1.41%	-6.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	1.46%	+1.49%

Volatility

SAMT vs. RAA - Volatility Comparison

Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) at 2.92%. This indicates that SAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAMT	RAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.82%	2.92%	+3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	7.44%	+5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	9.49%	+7.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	12.71%	+4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	12.71%	+4.23%

SAMT vs. RAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RAA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAMT vs. RAA - Dividend Comparison

SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than RAA's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	2.10%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	0.58%	0.70%	1.40%	1.49%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAMT and RAA in my portfolio?

SAMT and RAA have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAMT or RAA?

SAMT has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to RAA (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMT dropped -20.57% vs RAA's -11.80%.

Which ETF is better, SAMT or RAA?

On 1-year performance, SAMT leads with 42.07% vs 24.53% for RAA. On fees, SAMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, RAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAMT or RAA?

Over the 1-year period, SAMT has performed better with a 42.07% return vs 24.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAMT or RAA?

SAMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAMT or RAA?

RAA has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.58% for SAMT.

What is the main difference between SAMT and RAA?

SAMT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RAA is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Strategas and SMI Advisory Services. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SAMT and 0.85% for RAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.