PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMM vs. ABHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMM vs. ABHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) and Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMM achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than ABHY's 0.50% return.


SAMM

1D
1.49%
1M
8.21%
YTD
13.09%
6M
14.07%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABHY

1D
0.06%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.87%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMM vs. ABHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SAMM
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF
13.09%12.01%10.47%
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
0.50%8.73%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMM and ABHY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2024

0.51

The correlation between SAMM and ABHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMM vs. ABHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMM
SAMM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SAMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ABHY
ABHY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ABHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABHY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ABHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMM vs. ABHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) and Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAMMABHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.70

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

2.40

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

1.68

+2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.84

5.73

+8.11

SAMM vs. ABHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the ABHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMM and ABHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAMMABHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.70

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.25

+0.65

Drawdowns

SAMM vs. ABHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMM drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, which is greater than ABHY's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMM and ABHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMMABHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.09%

-16.96%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-3.43%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.29%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-5.73%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

1.01%

+1.36%

Volatility

SAMM vs. ABHY - Volatility Comparison

Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) at 0.97%. This indicates that SAMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMMABHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

0.97%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

2.73%

+10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

3.46%

+13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

5.59%

+13.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

5.44%

+13.39%

SAMM vs. ABHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ABHY's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMM vs. ABHY - Dividend Comparison

SAMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than ABHY's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
5.18%5.50%15.35%4.79%3.18%3.40%0.37%
SAMM
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF
0.91%1.03%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMM and ABHY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMM has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to ABHY (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMM dropped -24.09% vs ABHY's -16.96%.

On 1-year performance, SAMM leads with 31.89% vs 5.87% for ABHY. On fees, ABHY is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ABHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SAMM has performed better with a 31.89% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABHY is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMM.

ABHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 0.91% for SAMM.

SAMM is categorized as Momentum, while ABHY is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Strategas and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SAMM and 0.63% for ABHY.

SAMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMM and ABHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer