SAMBX vs. RPIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX).
SAMBX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 28, 2006. RPIFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008.
Performance
SAMBX vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SAMBX vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.19% | 5.88% | 7.03% | 11.21% | -0.86% | 4.86% | 0.41% | 6.66% | 0.24% | 3.89% |
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | -0.94% | 6.71% | 8.47% | 10.13% | -1.96% | 4.67% | 2.42% | 8.82% | 0.39% | 3.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAMBX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly higher than RPIFX's -0.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SAMBX having a 4.74% annualized return and RPIFX not far ahead at 4.79%.
SAMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.74%
RPIFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAMBX vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAMBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SAMBX vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank
SAMBX
RPIFX
SAMBX vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAMBX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.00 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.61 | 3.60 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.69 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 2.68 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 10.49 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAMBX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.00 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.78 | 1.85 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SAMBX and RPIFX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SAMBX vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison
SAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than RPIFX's 6.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.07% | 7.78% | 8.21% | 8.21% | 5.34% | 3.03% | 4.03% | 5.28% | 5.15% | 4.28% | 4.79% | 4.91% |
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | 6.63% | 7.22% | 7.77% | 6.53% | 4.12% | 3.94% | 4.29% | 5.12% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 4.31% | 4.45% |
Drawdowns
SAMBX vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAMBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, roughly equal to the maximum RPIFX drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMBX and RPIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAMBX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -25.10% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.22% | -1.92% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.66% | -5.90% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.91% | -19.67% | -1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -1.15% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -1.35% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.52% | -0.01% |
Volatility
SAMBX vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) have volatilities of 0.69% and 0.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAMBX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 0.72% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.77% | 1.76% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 2.80% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 2.73% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 3.79% | +0.14% |