PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIFX vs. OCSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIFX vs. OCSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIFX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than OCSL's -4.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RPIFX has underperformed OCSL with an annualized return of 4.83%, while OCSL has yielded a comparatively higher 7.88% annualized return.


RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.76%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
4.83%

OCSL

1D
-1.47%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
-4.33%
6M
-4.70%
1Y
-5.66%
3Y*
-4.04%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPIFX vs. OCSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
1.15%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.78%
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
-4.33%-6.06%-15.15%11.25%3.74%44.99%11.00%38.74%-6.31%-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIFX and OCSL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2008

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIFX vs. OCSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

OCSL
OCSL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OCSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OCSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCSL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPIFX vs. OCSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPIFXOCSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

0.97

+0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

-0.29

+4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.27

-0.62

+14.89

RPIFX vs. OCSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the OCSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIFX and OCSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPIFX vs. OCSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIFX drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, smaller than the maximum OCSL drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIFX and OCSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIFXOCSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

-59.52%

+34.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-19.77%

+18.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.28%

-34.16%

+31.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.90%

-34.16%

+28.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

-57.32%

+37.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-27.70%

+27.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-16.69%

+15.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

9.15%

-8.76%

Volatility

RPIFX vs. OCSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) is 0.57%, while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that RPIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIFXOCSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

6.58%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

17.82%

-16.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

21.84%

-19.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

19.96%

-17.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

26.89%

-23.09%

Dividends

RPIFX vs. OCSL - Dividend Comparison

RPIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, less than OCSL's 13.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
13.49%13.27%14.40%11.12%11.86%7.37%7.27%6.96%8.75%8.38%13.41%10.84%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
7.02%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIFX and OCSL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OCSL has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to RPIFX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIFX dropped -25.10% vs OCSL's -59.52%.

RPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIFX and OCSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer