SAIPX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SAIPX (Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Balanced Portfolio) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, SAIPX returned 6.37%/yr vs 6.99%/yr for FFANX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SAIPX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Balanced Portfolio (SAIPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAIPX achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIPX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 6.37%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.99% annualized return.

SAIPX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 4.81%
• 6M: 4.56%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: 10.80%
• 5Y*: 4.58%
• 10Y*: 6.37%

FFANX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 16.42%
• 3Y*: 11.28%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 6.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAIPX Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Balanced Portfolio	4.81%	11.24%	9.82%	11.69%	-14.84%	9.14%	9.03%	15.50%	-4.08%	10.88%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	7.45%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SAIPX and FFANX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007	0.96

The correlation between SAIPX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SAIPX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAIPX

SAIPX Risk / Return Rank: 57
SAIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SAIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SAIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SAIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SAIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Balanced Portfolio (SAIPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAIPX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.41	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.45	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.27	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.05	13.95	-2.90

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAIPX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAIPX drawdown since its inception was -29.80%, smaller than the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIPX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAIPX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.80%	-31.69%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.05%	-5.20%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.90%	-7.55%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.79%	-18.52%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.02%	-18.52%	-1.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.13%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-3.79%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	1.22%	-0.05%

Volatility

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Balanced Portfolio (SAIPX) is 2.41%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that SAIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAIPX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	2.94%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.27%	6.01%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.26%	7.09%	-0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.90%	7.94%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.71%	7.74%	-0.03%

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAIPX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAIPX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

SAIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.65%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%
SAIPX Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Balanced Portfolio	7.19%	7.89%	4.67%	2.20%	4.69%	6.89%	2.75%	3.41%	7.38%	4.85%	3.14%	6.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAIPX and FFANX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SAIPX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SAIPX or FFANX?

FFANX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to SAIPX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAIPX dropped -29.80% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.