PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAGPX vs. DGTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAGPX achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SAGPX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.21% annualized return.


SAGPX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.20%
YTD
10.06%
6M
10.63%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
10.94%

DGTSX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.60%
YTD
4.30%
6M
4.61%
1Y
10.24%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAGPX
Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio
10.06%15.24%21.99%18.93%-18.09%17.13%12.53%23.55%-7.12%19.33%
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
4.30%8.39%7.43%8.93%-8.06%10.20%7.29%9.80%-1.85%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SAGPX and DGTSX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2003

0.91

The correlation between SAGPX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAGPX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAGPX
SAGPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SAGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SAGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DGTSX
DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAGPXDGTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.64

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.94

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

17.59

-4.44

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAGPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAGPX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAGPXDGTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.07

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.89

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

1.00

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.94

-0.43

Drawdowns

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAGPX drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAGPX and DGTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAGPXDGTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.37%

-16.71%

-32.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-2.64%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-7.46%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-11.26%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.48%

-11.26%

-19.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-1.65%

-5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.59%

+1.16%

Volatility

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.14%. This indicates that SAGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAGPXDGTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.14%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

2.73%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

3.39%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

5.96%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

5.23%

+8.53%

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAGPX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAGPX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

SAGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.22%, more than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
5.70%5.54%7.28%4.75%2.77%7.62%2.12%2.57%2.99%1.25%1.26%1.50%
SAGPX
Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio
12.22%13.45%13.19%1.22%11.82%8.20%3.37%3.93%14.06%8.42%3.33%11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SAGPX and DGTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SAGPX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to DGTSX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAGPX dropped -49.37% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAGPX and DGTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer