SAEU.L vs. UD03.L
SAEU.L (iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds - SAEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAEU.L returned 9.78%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for UD03.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SAEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UD03.L.
Performance
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SAEU.L is traded in GBP, while UD03.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UD03.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEU.L achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 12.28% return.
SAEU.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- —
UD03.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEU.L iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.49% | 24.54% | 4.11% | 15.10% | -5.84% | 16.79% | 4.11% | 0.97% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 12.28% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEU.L and UD03.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, SAEU.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Industrials
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Healthcare
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Technology
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Consumer Cyclical
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Utilities
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Basic Materials
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Consumer Defensive
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Communication Services
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Energy
SAEU.L
UD03.L
Real Estate
SAEU.L
UD03.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAEU.L
UD03.L
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAEU.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.61 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 5.70 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 16.25 | -10.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAEU.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 3.47 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.75 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.19 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.68%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEU.L and UD03.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEU.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.68% | -30.85% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -9.80% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | -11.72% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -18.67% | +0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.19% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -3.31% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.56% | -0.45% |
Volatility
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that SAEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEU.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.58% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 16.13% | -3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 27.46% | -13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 47.29% | -30.55% |
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison
SAEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEU.L iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAEU.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.
SAEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAEU.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.
Find the right allocation for SAEU.L and UD03.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer