PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAEU.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAEU.L is traded in GBP, while UD03.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UD03.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEU.L achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 12.28% return.


SAEU.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.09%
YTD
6.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*

UD03.L

1D
0.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
12.28%
6M
15.08%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SAEU.L
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.49%24.54%4.11%15.10%-5.84%16.79%4.11%0.97%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
12.28%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEU.L and UD03.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.26

Over the past year, SAEU.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAEU.L
UD03.L

Financial Services

27.0%
28.5%

Industrials

19.3%
12.1%

Healthcare

14.8%
4.1%

Technology

9.9%
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
7.0%

Utilities

5.5%
7.7%

Basic Materials

5.1%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
14.6%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.1%

Energy

2.7%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Financial Services

SAEU.L
27.0%
UD03.L
28.5%

Industrials

SAEU.L
19.3%
UD03.L
12.1%

Healthcare

SAEU.L
14.8%
UD03.L
4.1%

Technology

SAEU.L
9.9%
UD03.L
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SAEU.L
5.9%
UD03.L
7.0%

Utilities

SAEU.L
5.5%
UD03.L
7.7%

Basic Materials

SAEU.L
5.1%
UD03.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

SAEU.L
4.8%
UD03.L
14.6%

Communication Services

SAEU.L
4.0%
UD03.L
3.1%

Energy

SAEU.L
2.7%
UD03.L
2.7%

Real Estate

SAEU.L
0.9%
UD03.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAEU.L
SAEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SAEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAEU.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.61

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

5.70

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

16.25

-10.21

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAEU.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAEU.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

3.47

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.75

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.19

-0.57

Drawdowns

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.68%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEU.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAEU.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.68%

-30.85%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-9.80%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-11.72%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-18.67%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.19%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-3.31%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.56%

-0.45%

Volatility

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that SAEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAEU.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.58%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

16.13%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

27.46%

-13.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

47.29%

-30.55%

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAEU.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

SAEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SAEU.L
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAEU.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SAEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SAEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

SAEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAEU.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAEU.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer