SAEU.L vs. MMS.L
SAEU.L (iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - SAEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. SAEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SAEU.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- —
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAEU.L iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.49% | 24.54% | 1.64% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Industrials
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Technology
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Utilities
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Energy
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
SAEU.L
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAEU.L
MMS.L
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAEU.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAEU.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEU.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEU.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | — | — |
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAEU.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAEU.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SAEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
SAEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAEU.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for SAEU.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer