SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE
SADM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SADM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped while IS3N.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SADM.DE returned 4.21%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for IS3N.DE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SADM.DE achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.
SADM.DE
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 46.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SADM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF | 13.18% | 18.73% | 12.63% | 0.17% | -15.44% | 6.79% | 18.80% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 20.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SADM.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SADM.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SADM.DE
IS3N.DE
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SADM.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 4.42 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 16.00 | -6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SADM.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.69 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.53 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SADM.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.30%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADM.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SADM.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.30% | -35.06% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -10.52% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -19.17% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -22.01% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -2.49% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -9.30% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.91% | +0.02% |
Volatility
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) is 5.86%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that SADM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SADM.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 7.16% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 14.69% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 17.32% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.19% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 18.04% | -1.07% |
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SADM.DE and IS3N.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SADM.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SADM.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SADM.DE and IS3N.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SADM.DE and IS3N.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
SADM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for SADM.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer