SAABY vs. IEMG
SAABY (Saab AB (publ)) is a stock, while IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Over the past 5 years, SAABY returned 51.27%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for IEMG. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAABY vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAABY achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 24.98% return.
SAABY
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 11.00%
- 3Y*
- 58.26%
- 5Y*
- 51.27%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 24.98%
- 6M
- 27.43%
- 1Y
- 49.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
SAABY vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | -2.86% | 177.56% | 39.85% | 47.07% | 67.28% | -48.79% | 82.51% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 24.98% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 50.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAABY and IEMG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020 | 0.08 |
The correlation between SAABY and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAABY vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
SAABY
IEMG
SAABY vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAABY | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.47 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 3.74 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 14.39 | -13.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAABY | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 2.55 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.40 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.35 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
SAABY vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAABY drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAABY and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAABY | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.75% | -38.71% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.04% | -13.21% | -23.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.04% | -17.21% | -19.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.04% | -35.83% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.68% | -2.30% | -28.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -12.97% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.33% | 3.43% | +10.90% |
Volatility
SAABY vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) has a higher volatility of 16.41% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) at 8.24%. This indicates that SAABY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAABY | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.41% | 8.24% | +8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.77% | 16.97% | +15.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.56% | 19.47% | +30.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.98% | 18.38% | +28.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.57% | 20.03% | +37.54% |
Dividends
SAABY vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
SAABY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than IEMG's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.20% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | 0.42% | 0.36% | 0.73% | 0.84% | 1.24% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAABY and IEMG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAABY has higher volatility (16.41%) compared to IEMG (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAABY dropped -52.75% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAABY and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer