PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAABY vs. RNMBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAABY achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -23.22% return.


SAABY

1D
-2.42%
1M
-7.32%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
13.70%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
57.58%
5Y*
51.38%
10Y*

RNMBY

1D
-1.42%
1M
-12.23%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-19.34%
1Y
-33.66%
3Y*
76.90%
5Y*
69.65%
10Y*
37.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
-2.51%177.56%39.85%47.07%67.28%-48.79%82.51%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-23.22%190.28%99.83%63.35%122.00%-13.84%70.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SAABY and RNMBY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.39

Over the past year, SAABY and RNMBY have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAABY:

$30.52B

RNMBY:

$64.80B

EPS

SAABY:

$5.98

RNMBY:

$3.56

PE Ratio

SAABY:

4.72

RNMBY:

77.91

PEG Ratio

SAABY:

0.14

RNMBY:

3.56

PS Ratio

SAABY:

0.37

RNMBY:

5.86

PB Ratio

SAABY:

0.68

RNMBY:

12.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAABY:

$82.29B

RNMBY:

$9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAABY:

$17.87B

RNMBY:

$4.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAABY:

$9.44B

RNMBY:

$1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAABY vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAABY
SAABY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SAABY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAABY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAABY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SAABY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAABY Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAABYRNMBYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.21

-0.72

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.66

-0.88

+1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.90

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

-0.77

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.85

-1.79

+2.64

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAABY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAABY and RNMBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAABYRNMBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

-0.72

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

1.57

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.80

-0.02

Drawdowns

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAABY drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, smaller than the maximum RNMBY drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAABY and RNMBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAABYRNMBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-67.75%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.04%

-44.06%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.04%

-44.06%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.04%

-44.06%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.44%

-40.04%

+9.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.89%

-16.68%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.05%

19.13%

-5.08%

Volatility

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) is 16.11%, while Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) has a volatility of 17.64%. This indicates that SAABY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAABYRNMBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

17.64%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.77%

34.44%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.46%

46.67%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.96%

44.76%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.59%

41.55%

+16.04%

Dividends

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

SAABY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than RNMBY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.98%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
0.42%0.36%0.73%0.84%1.24%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saab AB (publ) and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
19.16B
1.97B
(SAABY) Total Revenue
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Saab AB (publ) and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
23.4%
21.9%
Portfolio components
SAABY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 19.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

SAABY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

SAABY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAABY and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNMBY has higher volatility (17.64%) compared to SAABY (16.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAABY dropped -52.75% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.

SAABY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAABY and RNMBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer