SAABY vs. RNMBY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY).

Performance

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SAABY Saab AB (publ)	21.18%	177.56%	39.85%	47.07%	67.28%	-48.79%	82.51%
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR	-0.27%	190.28%	99.83%	63.35%	122.00%	-13.84%	70.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SAABY : $37.97B RNMBY : $40.06B
EPS SAABY : $5.82 RNMBY : $3.61
PE Ratio SAABY : 6.03 RNMBY : 101.06
PEG Ratio SAABY : 0.18 RNMBY : 4.62
PS Ratio SAABY : 0.48 RNMBY : 7.05
PB Ratio SAABY : 0.88 RNMBY : 8.00
Total Revenue (TTM) SAABY : $78.91B RNMBY : $9.91B
Gross Profit (TTM) SAABY : $17.17B RNMBY : $2.31B
EBITDA (TTM) SAABY : $9.18B RNMBY : -$4.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAABY achieves a 21.18% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -0.27% return.

SAABY

• 1D: 7.19%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 21.18%
• 6M: 16.03%
• 1Y: 75.02%
• 3Y*: 65.29%
• 5Y*: 60.29%
• 10Y*: —

RNMBY

• 1D: 8.48%
• 1M: -4.44%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: -20.50%
• 1Y: 25.59%
• 3Y*: 84.98%
• 5Y*: 81.24%
• 10Y*: 39.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SAABY vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAABY

SAABY Risk / Return Rank: 82
SAABY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SAABY Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SAABY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SAABY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SAABY Martin Ratio Rank: 85

RNMBY

RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 58
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAABY	RNMBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.53	+0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.03	+1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.13	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	0.86	+2.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.29	2.06	+6.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAABY Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAABY and RNMBY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAABY	RNMBY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	0.53	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.31	1.85	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.88	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between SAABY and RNMBY is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

SAABY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than RNMBY's 0.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SAABY Saab AB (publ)	0.29%	0.36%	0.73%	0.84%	1.24%	2.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR	0.49%	0.49%	0.96%	1.46%	1.82%	1.72%	1.56%	1.36%	1.47%	2.06%	2.97%	0.53%

Drawdowns

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAABY drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, smaller than the maximum RNMBY drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAABY and RNMBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAABY	RNMBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.75%	-67.75%	+15.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.66%	-32.54%	+7.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.73%	-40.33%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.53%	-22.12%	+8.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.66%	-16.48%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.56%	13.60%	-4.04%

Volatility

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) have volatilities of 16.69% and 17.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAABY	RNMBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.69%	17.38%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.06%	33.42%	-1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.43%	48.70%	+1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.27%	44.28%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.89%	41.19%	+16.70%

Financials

SAABY vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Saab AB (publ) and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SAABY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a gross profit of 5.60B and revenue of 27.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of -1.64B and revenue of 2.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -68.4%.

SAABY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported an operating income of 3.33B and revenue of 27.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 714.56M and revenue of 2.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.

SAABY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 27.70B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 324.92M and revenue of 2.40B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.