PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAAA.L is traded in GBP, while IAAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAAA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAAA.L achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than IAAA.L's 0.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SAAA.L having a 0.39% annualized return and IAAA.L not far behind at 0.38%.


SAAA.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.21%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
1.29%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*
0.39%

IAAA.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.50%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
1.35%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*
0.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.29%2.96%-3.46%2.32%-11.40%-6.94%8.12%1.61%2.74%-0.11%
IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
0.50%3.40%-4.06%2.60%-11.38%-7.06%7.58%1.91%2.58%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SAAA.L and IAAA.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.55

The correlation between SAAA.L and IAAA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAAA.L
SAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IAAA.L
IAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAAA.LIAAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.12

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.57

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

3.00

-1.26

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the IAAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAAA.L and IAAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAAA.LIAAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.70

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

-0.33

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.05

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.15

-0.02

Drawdowns

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, roughly equal to the maximum IAAA.L drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAAA.L and IAAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAAA.LIAAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-24.39%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

-3.01%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.68%

-5.84%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.85%

-18.89%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.70%

-24.39%

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.59%

-18.15%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-9.49%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.62%

+0.13%

Volatility

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) is 1.36%, while iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that SAAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAAA.LIAAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

2.31%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

4.89%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

6.78%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

9.35%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.86%

10.23%

-2.37%

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SAAA.L and IAAA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SAAA.L vs. IAAA.L - Dividend Comparison

SAAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, which matches IAAA.L's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
2.69%2.46%2.37%1.52%0.76%0.49%0.56%0.88%0.94%0.77%0.89%1.08%
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.68%2.48%2.34%1.57%0.76%0.48%0.61%0.89%0.87%0.81%0.83%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAAA.L and IAAA.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SAAA.L and IAAA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAAA.L and IAAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer