PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAA vs. XTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAA vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 11.19% return.


SAA

1D
1.62%
1M
2.29%
YTD
30.42%
6M
31.77%
1Y
66.46%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
11.62%

XTAP

1D
0.02%
1M
2.06%
YTD
11.19%
6M
12.40%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAA vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
30.42%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%7.22%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
11.19%17.58%14.26%23.46%-14.68%11.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SAA and XTAP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.73

The correlation between SAA and XTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAA vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAA
XTAP

Financial Services

16.9%
12.2%

Industrials

15.5%
8.5%

Technology

15.5%
33.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.0%

Healthcare

11.0%
9.5%

Real Estate

7.7%
2.0%

Energy

5.9%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
5.3%

Utilities

2.0%
2.6%

Financial Services

SAA
16.9%
XTAP
12.2%

Industrials

SAA
15.5%
XTAP
8.5%

Technology

SAA
15.5%
XTAP
33.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SAA
13.4%
XTAP
10.0%

Healthcare

SAA
11.0%
XTAP
9.5%

Real Estate

SAA
7.7%
XTAP
2.0%

Energy

SAA
5.9%
XTAP
4.0%

Basic Materials

SAA
5.1%
XTAP
1.9%

Communication Services

SAA
3.6%
XTAP
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

SAA
3.5%
XTAP
5.3%

Utilities

SAA
2.0%
XTAP
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAA vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAA vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAAXTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

4.67

-2.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

8.08

-5.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.28

-0.97

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

15.52

-11.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.46

82.64

-71.18

SAA vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAA and XTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAAXTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

4.67

-2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.77

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.81

-0.62

Drawdowns

SAA vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and XTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAAXTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-22.13%

-65.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-1.42%

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.84%

-11.83%

-39.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-22.13%

-33.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

0.00%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-3.46%

-23.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

0.27%

+5.36%

Volatility

SAA vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.20%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAAXTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.75%

1.20%

+7.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.86%

3.15%

+20.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.90%

4.69%

+31.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.53%

14.54%

+28.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.13%

14.41%

+31.72%

SAA vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAA vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.77%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAA and XTAP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAA has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to XTAP (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs XTAP's -22.13%.

On 5-year performance, XTAP leads with 11.17% vs 1.66% for SAA. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.79% for XTAP.

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAA and XTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer