SAA vs. TSYX
SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and TSYX (TSPY Lift ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SAA is passively managed, while TSYX is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for TSYX.
Performance
SAA vs. TSYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SAA
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 36.86%
- 6M
- 31.50%
- 1Y
- 66.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
TSYX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAA vs. TSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 27.06% |
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and TSYX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAA vs. TSYX — Risk / Return Rank
SAA
TSYX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAA vs. TSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAA | TSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAA vs. TSYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than TSYX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and TSYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAA | TSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -13.39% | -74.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -4.13% | +3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.35% | -2.98% | -24.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | — | — |
Volatility
SAA vs. TSYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAA | TSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.09% | 19.14% | +16.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 19.14% | +24.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 19.14% | +27.01% |
SAA vs. TSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAA vs. TSYX - Dividend Comparison
SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than TSYX's 7.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.74% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% |
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 7.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAA and TSYX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSYX.
TSYX has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 0.74% for SAA.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and TappAlpha. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.98% for TSYX.
Find the right allocation for SAA and TSYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer