SAA vs. SSO
SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SAA returned 11.43%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for SSO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SAA vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 28.22% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 11.43%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.21% annualized return.
SAA
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 28.22%
- 6M
- 25.09%
- 1Y
- 58.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
SAA vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 28.22% | 0.29% | 5.60% | 21.32% | -36.17% | 51.77% | -1.79% | 42.39% | -23.00% | 23.94% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.37% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and SSO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SAA and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAA vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAA
SSO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SAA
SSO
Industrials
SAA
SSO
Technology
SAA
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
SAA
SSO
Healthcare
SAA
SSO
Real Estate
SAA
SSO
Energy
SAA
SSO
Basic Materials
SAA
SSO
Communication Services
SAA
SSO
Consumer Defensive
SAA
SSO
Utilities
SAA
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAA vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SAA
SSO
SAA vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.91 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 12.80 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.25 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.59 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.68 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.42 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SAA vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -84.67% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -18.17% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.84% | -35.21% | -15.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | -46.73% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.54% | -59.34% | -15.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -1.40% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -19.57% | -7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 4.13% | +1.50% |
Volatility
SAA vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 5.66% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.89% | 17.78% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.92% | 23.60% | +12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.54% | 33.65% | +9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.13% | 35.89% | +10.24% |
SAA vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAA vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than SSO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.79% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAA and SSO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAA has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.21% vs 11.43% for SAA. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.
SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.62% for SSO.
SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAA and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer