SAA vs. NTSD
SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SAA is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
SAA vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SAA
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 30.42%
- 6M
- 31.77%
- 1Y
- 66.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
NTSD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAA vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 26.94% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and NTSD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAA vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
SAA
NTSD
SAA vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAA | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAA | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 5.75 | -5.57 |
Drawdowns
SAA vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAA | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -5.20% | -82.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | 0.00% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.43% | -0.84% | -26.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | — | — |
Volatility
SAA vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAA | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.90% | 24.31% | +11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 24.31% | +19.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.13% | 24.31% | +21.82% |
SAA vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAA vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.77% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAA and NTSD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.
SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for SAA and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer