S5EE.L vs. UC99.L
S5EE.L (UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc) and UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - S5EE.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD, while UC99.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, S5EE.L returned 15.95%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for UC99.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. S5EE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC99.L.
Performance
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S5EE.L achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than UC99.L's 10.42% return.
S5EE.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 11.63%
- YTD
- 20.24%
- 6M
- 22.26%
- 1Y
- 43.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 15.95%
- 10Y*
- —
UC99.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 29.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 20.24% | 11.67% | 20.01% | 22.12% | -9.72% | 28.03% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.42% | 8.68% | 22.60% | 27.58% | -15.03% | 29.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between S5EE.L and UC99.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2021 | 0.92 |
The correlation between S5EE.L and UC99.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Financial Services
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Healthcare
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Industrials
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Consumer Cyclical
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Consumer Defensive
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Real Estate
S5EE.L
UC99.L
-
Communication Services
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Basic Materials
S5EE.L
UC99.L
Energy
S5EE.L
-
UC99.L
-
Utilities
S5EE.L
-
UC99.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank
S5EE.L
UC99.L
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S5EE.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.43 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 3.10 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 11.14 | +7.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S5EE.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | 2.41 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.87 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S5EE.L drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum UC99.L drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5EE.L and UC99.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S5EE.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.25% | -23.20% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -9.47% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.25% | -23.20% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.25% | -23.20% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -4.24% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.64% | -0.34% |
Volatility
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that S5EE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S5EE.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.33% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.78% | 8.62% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 12.19% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 16.02% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 16.54% | -1.91% |
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S5EE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S5EE.L nor UC99.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
S5EE.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5EE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5EE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
S5EE.L is categorized as S&P 500, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for S5EE.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.
Find the right allocation for S5EE.L and UC99.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer