PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S5EE.L vs. UC99.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S5EE.L achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than UC99.L's 10.42% return.


S5EE.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
11.63%
YTD
20.24%
6M
22.26%
1Y
43.29%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*

UC99.L

1D
0.63%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.00%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
16.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
S5EE.L
UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc
20.24%11.67%20.01%22.12%-9.72%28.03%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.42%8.68%22.60%27.58%-15.03%29.16%

Correlation

The correlation between S5EE.L and UC99.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2021

0.92

The correlation between S5EE.L and UC99.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
S5EE.L
UC99.L

Technology

48.5%
54.7%

Financial Services

16.0%
7.3%

Healthcare

11.3%
10.9%

Industrials

9.0%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.7%
7.9%

Basic Materials

2.3%
0.0%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Technology

S5EE.L
48.5%
UC99.L
54.7%

Financial Services

S5EE.L
16.0%
UC99.L
7.3%

Healthcare

S5EE.L
11.3%
UC99.L
10.9%

Industrials

S5EE.L
9.0%
UC99.L
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

S5EE.L
4.5%
UC99.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

S5EE.L
3.1%
UC99.L
2.8%

Real Estate

S5EE.L
2.7%
UC99.L

-

Communication Services

S5EE.L
2.7%
UC99.L
7.9%

Basic Materials

S5EE.L
2.3%
UC99.L
0.0%

Energy

S5EE.L

-

UC99.L

-

Utilities

S5EE.L

-

UC99.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S5EE.L
S5EE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

UC99.L
UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S5EE.LUC99.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.43

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

3.10

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

11.14

+7.62

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is higher than the UC99.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S5EE.L and UC99.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S5EE.LUC99.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65

2.41

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.87

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Drawdowns

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S5EE.L drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum UC99.L drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5EE.L and UC99.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S5EE.LUC99.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-23.20%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-9.47%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

-23.20%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.25%

-23.20%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-4.24%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.64%

-0.34%

Volatility

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that S5EE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S5EE.LUC99.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.33%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

8.62%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

12.19%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

16.02%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

16.54%

-1.91%

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S5EE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

S5EE.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither S5EE.L nor UC99.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
S5EE.L
UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


S5EE.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S5EE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S5EE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.

S5EE.L is categorized as S&P 500, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for S5EE.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S5EE.L and UC99.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer