SUAS.L vs. IESG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUAS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L).
SUAS.L and IESG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SUAS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. It was launched on Aug 21, 2025. IESG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. Both SUAS.L and IESG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUAS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.42% | 10.95% | 14.07% | 24.37% | -18.68% | 31.17% | 25.85% | 31.51% | -2.17% | 25.21% |
IESG.L iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF | -3.01% | 16.62% | -0.80% | 20.29% | -19.53% | 17.77% | 12.86% | 27.51% | -11.51% | 26.85% |
Different Trading Currencies
SUAS.L is traded in USD, while IESG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUAS.L achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly higher than IESG.L's -3.01% return.
SUAS.L
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- -2.42%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- —
IESG.L
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- 8.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SUAS.L and IESG.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUAS.L
IESG.L
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUAS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUAS.L | IESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.49 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 0.76 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.10 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 0.62 | +1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 2.11 | +3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUAS.L | IESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.49 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.33 | +0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between SUAS.L and IESG.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUAS.L nor IESG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUAS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum IESG.L drawdown of -35.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUAS.L and IESG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUAS.L | IESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -25.95% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.52% | -11.32% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -20.77% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -7.34% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -4.74% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 3.30% | -0.93% |
Volatility
SUAS.L vs. IESG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUAS.L) is 5.12%, while iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that SUAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SUAS.L | IESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 6.25% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 10.70% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 16.70% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 17.46% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 17.40% | +0.47% |