S250.L vs. SGLP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

S250.L (Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF) and SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) are both exchange-traded funds - S250.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S250.L returned 5.79%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for SGLP.L. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S250.L achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than SGLP.L's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, S250.L has underperformed SGLP.L with an annualized return of 5.79%, while SGLP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

S250.L

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 10.35%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 5.79%

SGLP.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 5.45%
• 1Y: 33.77%
• 3Y*: 28.15%
• 5Y*: 19.87%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
S250.L Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF	5.31%	12.81%	7.93%	7.60%	-17.52%	16.69%	-4.90%	28.57%	-13.48%	17.36%
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A	3.97%	53.60%	28.14%	7.26%	11.83%	-2.88%	19.99%	14.65%	4.31%	1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between S250.L and SGLP.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2011	-0.06

The correlation between S250.L and SGLP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

S250.L vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S250.L

S250.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
S250.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
S250.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
S250.L Omega Ratio Rank: 32
S250.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
S250.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SGLP.L

SGLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SGLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
SGLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SGLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SGLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	S250.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.46	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.90	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.29	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	1.88	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	5.06	-0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S250.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S250.L and SGLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	S250.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.46	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	1.23	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.91	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.53	+0.02

Drawdowns

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S250.L drawdown since its inception was -40.91%, which is greater than SGLP.L's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S250.L and SGLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	S250.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.91%	-38.83%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-17.89%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.16%	-17.89%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.69%	-17.89%	-11.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.91%	-22.34%	-18.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-15.97%	+15.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.19%	-13.37%	+6.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	6.65%	-3.46%

Volatility

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) is 4.15%, while Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that S250.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	S250.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	5.10%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	19.90%	-9.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.41%	23.02%	-10.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	16.11%	-1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.43%	15.72%	+0.71%

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both S250.L and SGLP.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

S250.L vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither S250.L nor SGLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both S250.L and SGLP.L in my portfolio?

S250.L and SGLP.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, S250.L or SGLP.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, S250.L or SGLP.L?

S250.L and SGLP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

What is the main difference between S250.L and SGLP.L?

S250.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SGLP.L is Precious Metals. S250.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while SGLP.L tracks Gold.