S250.L vs. PRUK.L
S250.L (Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, S250.L returned 3.40%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. S250.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S250.L achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.
S250.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 14.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S250.L Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF | 5.31% | 12.81% | 7.93% | 7.60% | -17.52% | 16.69% | 19.29% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between S250.L and PRUK.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between S250.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S250.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
S250.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
S250.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
S250.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
S250.L
PRUK.L
Technology
S250.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
S250.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
S250.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
S250.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
S250.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
S250.L
PRUK.L
Energy
S250.L
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S250.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
S250.L
PRUK.L
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S250.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 0.76 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 2.52 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S250.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.70 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.05 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.38 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S250.L drawdown since its inception was -40.91%, which is greater than PRUK.L's maximum drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S250.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S250.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.91% | -36.10% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -13.05% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.16% | -18.00% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.69% | -36.10% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -3.76% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -14.80% | +7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 3.93% | -0.74% |
Volatility
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) is 4.15%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that S250.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S250.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.82% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 11.72% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 14.14% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 16.54% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 17.45% | -1.02% |
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S250.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
S250.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
S250.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% |
S250.L Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, S250.L and PRUK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for S250.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S250.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for S250.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer