RZLV vs. IPAC
RZLV (Rezolve AI Ltd) is a stock, while IPAC (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. Over the past year, RZLV returned -11.58% vs 27.51% for IPAC. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RZLV vs. IPAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZLV achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than IPAC's 13.01% return.
RZLV
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -13.40%
- 1Y
- -11.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPAC
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 27.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
RZLV vs. IPAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | -1.95% | -32.72% | -64.95% |
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 13.01% | 25.16% | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RZLV and IPAC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RZLV vs. IPAC — Risk / Return Rank
RZLV
IPAC
RZLV vs. IPAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RZLV | IPAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.30 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 2.41 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 8.54 | -8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RZLV vs. IPAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZLV drawdown since its inception was -89.63%, which is greater than IPAC's maximum drawdown of -30.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZLV and IPAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZLV | IPAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.63% | -30.99% | -58.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.15% | -11.49% | -60.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.88% | -2.77% | -74.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.74% | -7.45% | -61.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.68% | 3.23% | +49.45% |
Volatility
RZLV vs. IPAC - Volatility Comparison
Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) has a higher volatility of 22.78% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) at 6.35%. This indicates that RZLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RZLV | IPAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.78% | 6.35% | +16.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.03% | 14.30% | +56.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.88% | 17.27% | +93.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.02% | 16.80% | +126.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.02% | 16.59% | +126.43% |
Dividends
RZLV vs. IPAC - Dividend Comparison
RZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 3.91% | 4.32% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% |
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RZLV and IPAC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RZLV has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to IPAC (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZLV dropped -89.63% vs IPAC's -30.99%.
IPAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RZLV and IPAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer