RZG vs. DUSG
RZG (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF) and DUSG (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. RZG is passively managed, while DUSG is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RZG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DUSG.
Performance
RZG vs. DUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RZG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 21.89%
- YTD
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 37.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
DUSG
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RZG vs. DUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 7.58% |
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between RZG and DUSG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RZG vs. DUSG — Risk / Return Rank
RZG
DUSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RZG vs. DUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RZG | DUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RZG vs. DUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, which is greater than DUSG's maximum drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and DUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZG | DUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.52% | -4.19% | -54.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -1.66% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -1.14% | -10.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility
RZG vs. DUSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RZG | DUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 14.63% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 14.63% | +8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 14.63% | +9.99% |
RZG vs. DUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DUSG's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
RZG vs. DUSG - Dividend Comparison
RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than DUSG's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.37% | 0.95% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RZG and DUSG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUSG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUSG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZG.
RZG has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.14% for DUSG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZG and 0.32% for DUSG.
Find the right allocation for RZG and DUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer