RYWCX vs. NBGNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX).
RYWCX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 20, 2004. NBGNX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 27, 1988.
Performance
RYWCX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYWCX vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund | 5.56% | 7.76% | 7.20% | 17.03% | -30.33% | 16.37% | 15.23% | 11.58% | -9.55% | 15.23% |
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund | 1.64% | -4.70% | 9.04% | 15.57% | -19.49% | 18.07% | 24.86% | 29.47% | -6.91% | 15.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYWCX achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RYWCX has underperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.
RYWCX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
NBGNX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYWCX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYWCX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYWCX vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank
RYWCX
NBGNX
RYWCX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYWCX | NBGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.24 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 0.51 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.06 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.43 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 1.34 | +5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYWCX | NBGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.24 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.07 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.44 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.64 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYWCX and NBGNX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYWCX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison
RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.09%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 59.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.26% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund | 16.09% | 16.36% | 2.15% | 3.03% | 11.05% | 10.92% | 3.84% | 5.82% | 12.24% | 13.89% | 11.21% | 18.52% |
Drawdowns
RYWCX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYWCX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, which is greater than NBGNX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYWCX and NBGNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYWCX | NBGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.64% | -51.75% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -10.77% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.28% | -28.33% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.65% | -34.53% | -20.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.02% | -13.42% | +5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -7.14% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 4.26% | -1.00% |
Volatility
RYWCX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) at 5.66%. This indicates that RYWCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYWCX | NBGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 5.66% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 11.61% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 20.86% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 19.67% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 20.19% | +4.50% |