RYTPX vs. SHPIX
RYTPX (Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund) and SHPIX (ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYTPX returned -16.85%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for SHPIX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYTPX charges 2.16%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for SHPIX.
Performance
RYTPX vs. SHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RYTPX having a -16.58% return and SHPIX slightly higher at -16.57%. Over the past 10 years, RYTPX has underperformed SHPIX with an annualized return of -16.85%, while SHPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.
RYTPX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- -16.58%
- 1Y
- -28.26%
- 3Y*
- -26.57%
- 5Y*
- -21.48%
- 10Y*
- -16.85%
SHPIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- YTD
- -16.57%
- 1Y
- -24.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 46.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
RYTPX vs. SHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund | -16.58% | -27.24% | -29.24% | -31.96% | 29.31% | -43.38% | -50.05% | -41.84% | 4.42% | -32.54% |
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | -16.57% | -9.61% | 83.27% | 344.97% | 16.39% | -19.78% | -31.60% | -20.89% | 9.96% | -14.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYTPX and SHPIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RYTPX and SHPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYTPX vs. SHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RYTPX
SHPIX
RYTPX vs. SHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) and ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYTPX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.80 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.91 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | -1.54 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYTPX vs. SHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYTPX drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SHPIX drawdown of -96.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYTPX and SHPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYTPX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -96.86% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.99% | -27.97% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.03% | -41.50% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.66% | -41.50% | -34.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.13% | -68.01% | -28.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -75.80% | -24.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -74.99% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.12% | 16.49% | +0.63% |
Volatility
RYTPX vs. SHPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) at 3.80%. This indicates that RYTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYTPX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 3.80% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.98% | 14.20% | +5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 19.44% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.96% | 189.01% | -155.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 257.92% | 134.65% | +123.27% |
RYTPX vs. SHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYTPX has a 2.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SHPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYTPX vs. SHPIX - Dividend Comparison
RYTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than SHPIX's 33.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund | 6.17% | 5.15% | 6.90% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% |
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | 33.17% | 5.70% | 0.00% | 17.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYTPX and SHPIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYTPX has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to SHPIX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYTPX dropped -99.92% vs SHPIX's -96.86%.
RYTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.15 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYTPX and SHPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer