RYTPX vs. PSTIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RYTPX (Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund) and PSTIX (PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYTPX returned -16.47%/yr vs -9.92%/yr for PSTIX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RYTPX charges 2.16%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for PSTIX.

Performance

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYTPX achieves a -13.45% return, which is significantly lower than PSTIX's -5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, RYTPX has underperformed PSTIX with an annualized return of -16.47%, while PSTIX has yielded a comparatively higher -9.92% annualized return.

RYTPX

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: 1.59%
• 6M: -11.47%
• YTD: -13.45%
• 1Y: -26.44%
• 3Y*: -24.84%
• 5Y*: -20.33%
• 10Y*: -16.47%
• ALL TIME*: -21.79%

PSTIX

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: -4.53%
• YTD: -5.26%
• 1Y: -10.18%
• 3Y*: -8.25%
• 5Y*: -5.88%
• 10Y*: -9.92%
• ALL TIME*: -7.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund	-13.45%	-27.24%	-29.24%	-31.96%	29.31%	-43.38%	-50.05%	-41.84%	4.42%	-32.54%
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	-5.26%	-8.24%	-11.28%	-11.01%	17.41%	-21.89%	-20.83%	-20.27%	5.21%	-14.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RYTPX and PSTIX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004	0.92

The correlation between RYTPX and PSTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYTPX vs. PSTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYTPX

RYTPX Risk / Return Rank: 0
RYTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

PSTIX

PSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 1
PSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYTPX	PSTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	-0.65	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.28	-0.88	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.90	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	-0.54	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	-1.01	-0.29

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYTPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the PSTIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYTPX and PSTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYTPX drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than PSTIX's maximum drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYTPX and PSTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYTPX	PSTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-90.52%	-9.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.99%	-15.05%	-14.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.03%	-33.92%	-34.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.66%	-37.53%	-38.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.13%	-67.42%	-28.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.92%	-90.23%	-9.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.40%	-57.40%	-25.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.99%	7.99%	+10.00%

Volatility

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) at 3.19%. This indicates that RYTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYTPX	PSTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	3.19%	+3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.21%	9.63%	+10.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.68%	12.47%	+13.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.98%	16.56%	+17.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	238.76%	17.50%	+221.26%

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYTPX has a 2.16% expense ratio, which is higher than PSTIX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYTPX vs. PSTIX - Dividend Comparison

RYTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than PSTIX's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	4.09%	1.16%	0.68%	5.06%	1.23%	1.26%	1.68%	0.00%	3.57%
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund	5.95%	5.15%	6.90%	3.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYTPX and PSTIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, RYTPX and PSTIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RYTPX or PSTIX?

RYTPX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to PSTIX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYTPX dropped -99.92% vs PSTIX's -90.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.