PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYTNX vs. RYTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYTNX achieves a 20.21% return, which is significantly higher than RYTPX's -17.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RYTNX has outperformed RYTPX with an annualized return of 22.93%, while RYTPX has yielded a comparatively lower -17.51% annualized return.


RYTNX

1D
0.51%
1M
10.11%
YTD
20.21%
6M
20.19%
1Y
54.37%
3Y*
36.65%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
22.93%

RYTPX

1D
-0.50%
1M
-7.67%
YTD
-17.43%
6M
-17.38%
1Y
-35.70%
3Y*
-29.05%
5Y*
-22.62%
10Y*
-17.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
20.21%24.88%41.95%45.20%-39.32%55.55%20.31%62.29%-15.06%42.95%
RYTPX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
-17.43%-27.24%-29.24%-31.96%29.31%-43.38%-50.05%-41.84%4.42%-32.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RYTNX and RYTPX is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

-0.97

The correlation between RYTNX and RYTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYTNX vs. RYTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYTNX
RYTNX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RYTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

RYTPX
RYTPX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYTNXRYTPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.36

-1.53

+3.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

-2.40

+5.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.74

+0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

-1.00

+4.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.24

-1.71

+14.95

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYTNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the RYTPX Sharpe Ratio of -1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYTNX and RYTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYTNXRYTPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

-1.53

+3.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

-0.67

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

-0.06

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-0.06

+0.31

Drawdowns

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYTNX drawdown since its inception was -86.64%, smaller than the maximum RYTPX drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYTNX and RYTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYTNXRYTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-99.92%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-35.66%

+17.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.36%

-67.95%

+32.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-75.60%

+28.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.23%

-96.55%

+37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-99.92%

+99.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.54%

-82.33%

+53.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

21.14%

-16.94%

Volatility

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) have volatilities of 5.62% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYTNXRYTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

5.66%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

18.01%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.73%

23.74%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.75%

33.74%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.16%

289.86%

-253.70%

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYTNX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is lower than RYTPX's 2.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYTNX vs. RYTPX - Dividend Comparison

RYTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than RYTPX's 6.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
3.98%4.79%5.45%0.14%0.00%0.14%0.69%1.84%0.00%5.84%0.16%1.52%
RYTPX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
6.23%5.15%6.90%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYTNX and RYTPX have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYTPX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to RYTNX (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYTNX dropped -86.64% vs RYTPX's -99.92%.

RYTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYTNX and RYTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer