RYSE vs. FOPC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RYSE (Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and FOPC (Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RYSE is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Vest, while FOPC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Frontier. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RYSE returned 1.55% vs 4.70% for FOPC. At a correlation of -0.67, they often move in opposite directions. RYSE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FOPC.

Performance

RYSE vs. FOPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYSE achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than FOPC's 0.46% return.

RYSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 6M: 5.91%
• 1Y: 1.55%
• 3Y*: 4.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FOPC

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.43%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYSE vs. FOPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RYSE Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF	2.52%	-3.09%	0.82%
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	0.46%	6.54%	-0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RYSE and FOPC is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	-0.67

The correlation between RYSE and FOPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.80 (1 year) to -0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RYSE vs. FOPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYSE

RYSE Risk / Return Rank: 11
RYSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RYSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
RYSE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
RYSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
RYSE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FOPC

FOPC Risk / Return Rank: 47
FOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYSE vs. FOPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYSE	FOPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	1.65	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	2.45	-2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.30	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	2.16	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.40	7.33	-6.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYSE vs. FOPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the FOPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYSE and FOPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYSE	FOPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	1.65	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.57	-1.15

Drawdowns

RYSE vs. FOPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYSE drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than FOPC's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYSE and FOPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYSE	FOPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-2.18%	-17.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.06%	-2.18%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.83%	-0.97%	-6.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.18%	-0.41%	-8.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	0.64%	+3.22%

Volatility

RYSE vs. FOPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) is 0.00%, while Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that RYSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYSE	FOPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	1.03%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.64%	2.19%	+4.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.64%	2.86%	+7.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.92%	3.10%	+11.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	3.10%	+11.82%

RYSE vs. FOPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FOPC's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYSE vs. FOPC - Dividend Comparison

RYSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than FOPC's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	4.27%	4.42%	0.06%	0.00%
RYSE Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF	1.37%	1.86%	2.58%	24.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYSE and FOPC in my portfolio?

RYSE and FOPC have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYSE or FOPC?

FOPC has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to RYSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYSE dropped -19.70% vs FOPC's -2.18%.

Which ETF is better, RYSE or FOPC?

On 1-year performance, FOPC leads with 4.70% vs 1.55% for RYSE. On fees, RYSE is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, RYSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RYSE or FOPC?

Over the 1-year period, FOPC has performed better with a 4.70% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RYSE or FOPC?

RYSE is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FOPC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RYSE or FOPC?

FOPC has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 1.37% for RYSE.

What is the main difference between RYSE and FOPC?

RYSE is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while FOPC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vest and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RYSE and 0.87% for FOPC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.