PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYRRX vs. RYTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYRRX achieves a 18.65% return, which is significantly higher than RYTPX's -15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RYRRX has outperformed RYTPX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while RYTPX has yielded a comparatively lower -16.75% annualized return.


RYRRX

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.24%
6M
11.87%
YTD
18.65%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
9.06%

RYTPX

1D
1.60%
1M
-1.91%
6M
-12.78%
YTD
-15.51%
1Y
-27.19%
3Y*
-26.25%
5Y*
-20.94%
10Y*
-16.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
18.65%10.88%9.72%15.17%-21.70%13.23%17.81%23.57%-12.58%12.88%
RYTPX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
-15.51%-27.24%-29.24%-31.96%29.31%-43.38%-50.05%-41.84%4.42%-32.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RYRRX and RYTPX is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

-0.82

The correlation between RYRRX and RYTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYRRX vs. RYTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYRRX
RYRRX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RYRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RYTPX
RYTPX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYRRXRYTPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.82

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

-0.92

+3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

-1.62

+11.37

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYRRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the RYTPX Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYRRX and RYTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYRRX drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, smaller than the maximum RYTPX drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYRRX and RYTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYRRXRYTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.36%

-99.92%

+39.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-29.99%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-68.03%

+40.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.02%

-75.66%

+42.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-96.13%

+53.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-99.92%

+97.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-82.37%

+70.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

16.93%

-13.69%

Volatility

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) is 4.80%, while Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that RYRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYRRXRYTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

8.02%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

20.00%

-5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

25.11%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

33.96%

-11.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

257.97%

-234.55%

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYRRX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RYTPX's 2.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYRRX vs. RYTPX - Dividend Comparison

RYRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than RYTPX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
0.55%0.65%1.02%0.19%0.00%12.84%0.00%1.46%0.00%4.82%0.00%2.66%
RYTPX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
6.09%5.15%6.90%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYRRX and RYTPX have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYTPX has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to RYRRX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYRRX dropped -60.36% vs RYTPX's -99.92%.

RYRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYRRX and RYTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer