RYRRX vs. UWM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RYRRX (Rydex Russell 2000 Fund) and UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) are both funds - RYRRX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds, while UWM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, RYRRX returned 9.25%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for UWM. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RYRRX charges 1.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UWM.

Performance

RYRRX vs. UWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYRRX achieves a 17.99% return, which is significantly lower than UWM's 26.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RYRRX has underperformed UWM with an annualized return of 9.25%, while UWM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.

RYRRX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 17.99%
• 6M: 16.12%
• 1Y: 36.99%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: 9.25%

UWM

• 1D: -7.10%
• 1M: -1.17%
• YTD: 26.18%
• 6M: 22.03%
• 1Y: 64.82%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 0.82%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYRRX vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYRRX Rydex Russell 2000 Fund	17.99%	10.88%	9.72%	15.17%	-21.70%	13.23%	17.81%	23.57%	-12.58%	12.88%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	26.18%	13.59%	11.32%	22.62%	-43.69%	23.91%	16.57%	48.62%	-25.89%	26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RYRRX and UWM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007	0.99

The correlation between RYRRX and UWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYRRX vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYRRX

RYRRX Risk / Return Rank: 58
RYRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RYRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RYRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RYRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
RYRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

UWM

UWM Risk / Return Rank: 57
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 47
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYRRX vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYRRX	UWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.82	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.39	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	3.16	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	10.80	+1.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYRRX vs. UWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYRRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the UWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYRRX and UWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYRRX	UWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.82	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.02	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.25	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.14	+0.13

Drawdowns

RYRRX vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYRRX drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, smaller than the maximum UWM drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYRRX and UWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYRRX	UWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.36%	-88.21%	+27.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-22.28%	+10.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.03%	-49.79%	+21.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.02%	-61.62%	+28.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.84%	-71.46%	+28.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-7.71%	+7.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.22%	-30.87%	+18.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	6.52%	-3.29%

Volatility

RYRRX vs. UWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) is 5.72%, while ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a volatility of 13.32%. This indicates that RYRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYRRX	UWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.72%	13.32%	-7.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.63%	27.80%	-14.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.17%	38.73%	-19.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.58%	45.12%	-22.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.45%	46.13%	-22.68%

RYRRX vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYRRX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than UWM's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYRRX vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison

RYRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than UWM's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYRRX Rydex Russell 2000 Fund	0.55%	0.65%	1.02%	0.19%	0.00%	12.84%	0.00%	1.46%	0.00%	4.82%	0.00%	2.66%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	0.82%	1.05%	1.16%	0.34%	0.40%	0.00%	0.07%	0.55%	0.41%	0.11%	0.27%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYRRX and UWM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, RYRRX and UWM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RYRRX or UWM?

UWM has higher volatility (13.32%) compared to RYRRX (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYRRX dropped -60.36% vs UWM's -88.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.