PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYPRX vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYPRX achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than FSMD's 17.58% return.


RYPRX

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.77%
6M
6.63%
YTD
18.74%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
11.11%
ALL TIME*
11.17%

FSMD

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.21%
6M
12.51%
YTD
17.58%
1Y
26.51%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.79M$5.01M$5.73M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RYPRX
Royce Premier Fund
18.74%5.74%2.91%22.76%-15.67%16.07%11.51%14.79%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
17.58%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RYPRX and FSMD is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.93

The correlation between RYPRX and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYPRX vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYPRX
RYPRX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RYPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RYPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYPRXFSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.16

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

10.55

-5.48

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYPRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYPRX and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYPRX drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYPRX and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYPRXFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-40.67%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-8.44%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

-22.16%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-22.16%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-2.52%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-5.92%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

2.52%

+2.07%

Volatility

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYPRXFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.20%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

12.40%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

15.87%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

18.55%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

21.33%

-0.07%

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYPRX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYPRX vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

RYPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than FSMD's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.23%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYPRX
Royce Premier Fund
10.15%12.05%9.52%6.89%9.00%21.23%5.55%20.68%29.26%15.18%13.42%24.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYPRX and FSMD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYPRX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to FSMD (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYPRX dropped -51.47% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYPRX and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer